"marabou" <not### [at] availableyet> wrote in message 
news:200### [at] availableyet...
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:28:20 +0100
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
> [..]
>>    I'm no expert, but couldn't this be an 'inverse' situation?
>>
> [..]
>
> pardon, what do you you mean?

   Well, basically, it will turn an object 'inside out', (not sure if it 
works with iso's). I'm just thinking/wondering what would happen if you used 
'inverse'  - would your original 'invisible' side now be visible in the 
mirror, and vice verse?

    If that's not viable, have you tried giving your object some 
thickness/depth to see if the problem is still there?

      ~Steve~

Post a reply to this message