I apologise for causing such controversy. I usually post my IRTC WIPs for 
suggestions just to guage opinion on what people think of the work and I 
have previously posted WIPs for earlier rounds of the SCC, it didn't occur 
to me that this would be any different. I thought this was a perfect 
opportunity to invite discussion of some syntactical trickery in POV, though 
I grant you it does contravene the anonymity rule.

Why is it anonymous anyway? I doubt if anyone has a significant personal 
bias.

Anyway, sorry if I've bent the rules, it wasn't my intention and I don't 
believe it will gain me any advantage. I mostly just wanted to show off my 
work :)
-- 
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com

"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:4525c9d5@news.povray.org...
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> For what it's worth, it would bother me only if there was an actual
>> prize involved beyond recognition. Otherwise, it would seem like a
>> good-natured competition to promote POV and POVing in general, yes?
>
>  Bending the rules (written or unwritten) doesn't still feel right.
> It feels unfair.
>
> -- 
>                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message