Daniel Hulme <pho### [at] isticorg> wrote:
> > Daniel Hulme <pho### [at] isticorg> wrote:
> > > I have no idea why after all these years people still think
> > > quicksort is a good idea. It's so trivial to find an example where
> > > it takes O(n^2) time.
> > 
> >   It's certainly not very trivial to find such an example of the
> > choice of pivot in the paritioning is smart.

> Thank you for illustrating my point :->

  Your point? You said it's trivial to find such an example, and I said
it isn't. How does that illustrate your point? Unless you were being
sarcastic or something.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message