>> As an aside, if the SDL ever becomes object-oriented, the whole subject 
>> will become a whole lot more confusing. ;-)
> 
>   Not really. C++ doesn't talk about "objects" anywhere in its syntax,
> and neither has the SDL to do so (when referring to class instances).
> Even the documentation could avoid the word "object" in relation to
> class instances (and talk about "instances" instead).

Yeah, that sounds like it would work. Just need to be careful to *stick* 
to that terminology and it should be fine...


BTW, I was thinking about just inventing my own new SDL language and 
writting a program that can convert it to standard POV-Ray SDL. But, 
unfortunately, this would of course involve writing a parse, so that 
project never really got anywhere...

Post a reply to this message