POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Clouds : Re: Clouds Server Time
5 Nov 2024 14:22:33 EST (-0500)
  Re: Clouds  
From: Skip Talbot
Date: 24 Aug 2006 13:01:39
Message: <44eddb73@news.povray.org>
Nice work Bill.  It reminds me of my own attempts at clouds (see 
attached  picture).  I used the f_torus_gumdrop function to get the flat 
base.  I moved the bounding box so the torus and opposite gumdrop were 
cropped out though 
(http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/isotut/builtin3.htm#tg).  I believe I 
used bozo on top as well with just some turbulence, its been awhile.

Your attempts are significantly better though thanks to the speed 
increases.  I rendered it as an isosurface with a scattering media 
density and I believe it took several hours on my 450 MHz.  I was also 
running into the transparency issues with overlapping media containers.

Anyway, the shape works fairly well for cumulus mediocris and cumulus 
humilis.  The bozo pattern doesn't really hold up on the taller forms of 
cumulus and cumulonimbus.  You need to be able to model a cauliflower 
type shape and I'm still scratching my head on that one.  I thought 
about starting with a base shape like the gumdrop or hemisphere and 
tracing spheres of decreasing of radius on top of it, but haven't gotten 
around to actually playing with it.

Skip


Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Recently I've been playing with Gilles Tran's cloud generation technique (to
> whit: creating .dxf files from slices of monochrome pigments using an
> animation loop, and then using the .dxf file to define a media density -
> see http://www.oyonale.com/ressources/english/sources13.htm). I decided not
> to use his actual MakeCloud macro; I thought I'd do it from scratch to learn
> the ropes properly.
> 
> This image is my most recent effort. Getting the media settings right didn't
> take too long, but I did have some difficulty balancing the solidity of the
> cloud with its opacity. This sounds like the same thing, but I found that
> the only way to make a cloud really opaque was to up the absorption. This
> made the shadowed areas really dark (more like heavy smoke), when in
> reality clouds tend to exhibit a kind of translucency. Adding a small
> amount of emission cured this problem nicely.
> 
> More difficult is the shape. I think I've nailed the flat undersides that
> typify low-level heavy clouds, but getting the rest of it to look suitably
> 'billowy' at the same time is quite tricky. I've settled on using an
> isosurface to define the pigment (I find the shapes are easier to control);
> this cloud is a small-scale granite added to a larger-scale bozo added to
> tall hemisphere on top of an inverted flattened hemisphere (the latter
> provides the flat underside).
> 
> Comments / suggestions for other refining the shape, anyone?
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'cloud test 16.jpg' (20 KB)

Preview of image 'cloud test 16.jpg'
cloud test 16.jpg


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.