Warp wrote:
> Chris Cason <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote:
>>   http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1970190,00.asp
> 
>   3.6 minutes to render the standard benchmark? That's quite cool.

The version of the benchmark in the beta has some stuff turned off due to
feature implementation issues in previous betas, not sure of the full list
but it's certainly not as CPU-intensive as the release version.

-- Chris

Post a reply to this message