"> Semantic completion -- "Intellisense", in M$ terms -- is only really nice 
in
> heavily OO languages, so that you can chain several deeply nested method
> calls very easily.  I don't think it'd be of much use in a procedural
> language like the SDL.

I've developed over the last weekend a bunch of macros that call other 
macros, so I was really thinking along those lines.


-- 
#####-----#####-----#####
POV Tips and Hints at ...
http://povman.blogspot.com/

Post a reply to this message