"Stefan Viljoen polard.com>" <spamnot@<removethis> wrote in message 
news:446968eb@news.povray.org...
> > Personaly, I would go for a resolution around 3 to 5 times the TV
> > resolution's.
> 
> Which, for an ordinary non-HD set is what? 460x200? I know it is very 
low,
> compared to PC monitors, but how low?

:)
it's not that low :)
PAL-resolution (which is what we use here in Europe) is 720x567 
(although the number of collumns isn't really defined, only the number 
of lines)
NTSC, the American standard, has a lower resolution, but more fps (30 
instead of 25, which is useless imho, since movies are shot at 24fps)

(both are interlaced, so you actually get 50 or 60 fps, which 'happens' 
to be the same as the AC-frequency :))

cu!
-- 
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x)            // ZK http://www.povplace.com

Post a reply to this message