Still amazing.
caution: critical comments follow.

Lets see. Scale. The volcano is about 300px tall or 1000m per a previous
post or about 3m per pixel at the summit.
There's ultra-mega-coarse grain lava up there. You might find that with an
old inactive and eroded volcano I suppose, and this is not that. Also all
the smoke and dust must dull the snow off some?

And your slopes are still way too steep to be realistic (about 120+ degrees
at summit).
Check http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/gallery/kilauea/erupt/2553022_L.jpg
for a dose of realism with a new volcano 250m above the plain.
The photo gallery of the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory is replete with all
sorts of well annotated pictures including hi-res.
http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/gallery/

The alternative is Disney :(

DLM


"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:43f2f8fa@news.povray.org...
> I definitely agree, there's something that just doesn't quite look right.
> But I can't put my finger on it. At the moment I suspect it's the sky
colour
> not matching the lighting & fog... maybe...
>
> -- 
> Tek
> http://evilsuperbrain.com
>
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
> news:43f2e627$1@news.povray.org...
> > Tek wrote:
> >> And that's about it. What do you think?
> >
> >   It's looking quite good.
> >
> >   However, there's still some non-photorealistic quality to it,
> > even though I can't put my finger on it.
> >   It might perhaps be that the contrast in the snow is too strong.
>
>

Post a reply to this message