-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dave Matthews wrote:
> Thanks, and I agree it's too fast.  Adding frames to slow it down makes it
> huge.  I'm wondering if there's a more efficient compression method that
> doesn't fuzz up the image too much.  I like to keep the size large (640 x
> 480), but it's already a bit of a waste of space at 6 megs....
> 
	DivX? Here's a 630k version of yours without fuzz:
http://jeberger.free.fr/tmp/garfieldfull.avi

	Or you could go for MPEG1. It'll be bigger than DivX, but still
much smaller than your MJPEG for the same quality...

		Jerome

- --
******************************
*      Jerome M. Berger      *
*  mailto:jeb### [at] freefr   *
*  http://jeberger.free.fr/  *
******************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD4lJXd0kWM4JG3k8RAiYtAJ9Mfb8bix15tyeaywulc4X5vRD42wCeL3B1
odiLtUouPdAV+pLfwNIin7Q=
=qdoX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message