"Dave Matthews" <dav### [at] mnwestedu> wrote in message 
news:web.43e20bb2d2cab98a8c7259570@news.povray.org...
> Thanks, and I agree it's too fast.  Adding frames to slow it down 
makes it
> huge.  I'm wondering if there's a more efficient compression method 
that
> doesn't fuzz up the image too much.  I like to keep the size large 
(640 x
> 480), but it's already a bit of a waste of space at 6 megs....

lower framerate? :)

Post a reply to this message