POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Quality difference btw V3.1 and V3.6 : Re: Quality difference btw V3.1 and V3.6 Server Time
1 Aug 2024 08:14:50 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Quality difference btw V3.1 and V3.6  
From: Zeger Knaepen
Date: 29 Dec 2005 03:44:02
Message: <43b3a1d2$1@news.povray.org>
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:43b3a038@news.povray.org...
> Zeger Knaepen <zeg### [at] povplacecom> wrote:
> > I still think a bloom-effect would be the best and most realistic 
solution :p
> 
>   Hmm... Did I say something which can be understood as opposing such
> technique? Your answer sounds as if I had given argument against it.

oh, no, not at all!  But you didn't mention bloom, so I thought I would 
:)

cu!
-- 
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x)            // ZK http://www.povplace.com


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.