Warp wrote:
>   (Of course one reason for that is that MS has still not published a
> good, stable and well-tested 64-bit version of Windows...)

64-bit CPUs Windows might run on are how new?  Besides, MS has still not 
published a good, stable and well-tested *32-bit* version of Windows...

*ba-dum bum*

(XP is pretty good and stable, but...well-tested?)

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message