John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I've noticed that this way of using macros to express things leads to 
> parse errors.  There is a work-around (which has already been posted), 
> but the docs give no reason for this construction to fail.  Is this 
> behavior deemed worthy of correction?

  The documentation could be clearer. It's difficult to explain clearly,
though. Any suggestions?
  The behaviour itself is logical, but not easy to explain.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message