|
 |
Yeah that's kinda my thoughts on the subject too: When you take a photo you
go to great lengths to avoid these errors, but when it's CG you should
intentionally create them so it loses the perfection people expect in CG :)
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:web.43732ff8af2812b6731f01d10@news.povray.org...
>I have to second the above - certainly the most photo-realistic raytrace
> I've ever seen! Personally, I like the slight blurred effect - it makes it
> more real. Perfectly focused and framed photographs are very difficult to
> take - the blur is suggestive of the flames' dancing and the waves rolling
> in, and also hides that crisp 'CG' look that so many otherwise incredible
> images possess.
>
> Now that I come to think about it, most 'nice' effects obtained using
> photography are actually artifacts of an imperfect recording - the quest
> for photo-realism is a matter of hunting down lens and film glitches. And
> then shooting them, stuffing them and mounting them so they look pretty
> hanging on the wall.
>
> With regard to the flames in water - could be firewood soaked in gasoline?
> :)
>
> Bill, not worthy
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
