Sebastian H. wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> 
>> Sebastian H. <van### [at] gmxde> wrote:
>>
>>> But that's not the point here.
>>> I got the impression some answers in this group are sometime a
>>> bit too sophistivated to help new user with a concrete problem
>>
>>
>>
>>   It doesn't introduce any complicatedness to the text if you add
>> clarifying words like "typically", "about", "approximately", etc.
>>
>>   That is, instead of saying "an image of x*y pixels takes n kilobytes
>> as a png" it's more accurate, yet in no way more difficult to understand,
>> to say "for example an image of x*y takes typically about n to m
>> kilobytes as a png".
>>
> 
> Ok right, shame on me, I was too lazy.
... to check what I wrote...

Sebastian

Post a reply to this message