Warp wrote:
> Sebastian H. <van### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> 
>>But that's not the point here.
>>I got the impression some answers in this group are sometime a
>>bit too sophistivated to help new user with a concrete problem
> 
> 
>   It doesn't introduce any complicatedness to the text if you add
> clarifying words like "typically", "about", "approximately", etc.
> 
>   That is, instead of saying "an image of x*y pixels takes n kilobytes
> as a png" it's more accurate, yet in no way more difficult to understand,
> to say "for example an image of x*y takes typically about n to m
> kilobytes as a png".
> 

Ok right, shame on me, I was too lazy.

Post a reply to this message