|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Photorealism isn't about the renderer. No program can create something
that looks like a photo just by pushing two or three buttons. Any
program that can generate an image can be used to make something which
is photorealistic if the time, effort, skill, and ability of the artist
are enough. Even with MS Paint (though that takes a bit more effort).
One thing the 'photorealistic' 3D graphics considered superior to POV
have: photo-based textures.
Another thing that irritates me is the attitude of "it's not
bleeding-edge, therefore it's infinitely inferior". :P
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |