Slime wrote:
> It seems that the merge{} structure doesn't elliminate internal surfaces as
> it should; see this scene:

Indeed, it looks like inner intersections are not properly eliminated 
somewhere.  We are working to fix this in the next beta (if possible).

> Manually constructing the merge doesn't work either:

This is not surprising because internally both your "manual" and your 
"automatic" approach produce the exact same result.  That is, and "inverse" 
of CSG operation (depending on type) is equal directly specifying the other 
CSG operation.

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message