Jim Charter wrote:

> I just meant that Flash or no Flash I would call it a web site.  Mostly 
> because there is not other term for it that would have broad 
> understanding.  Maybe "Flash Clip Site" would be more palatable let's 
> say, but far fewer people would recognize what was meant, a speaker 
> using that term would just have to clarify his/her meaning "I mean a web 
> site that depends on Flash"

Ah, I see. I you do have a point there, the understanding matter.

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message