Eero Ahonen wrote:

>>
>> "Web site" seems like a serviceable enough term to me.
> 
> 
> Have to say I don't get the "serviceable" here. Might be the slow mind 
> of mine right now, but I just don't understand this. Meaning you 
> understand my opinion, or that you disagree with my opinion? Or 
> something else?
> 
I just meant that Flash or no Flash I would call it a web site.  Mostly 
because there is not other term for it that would have broad 
understanding.  Maybe "Flash Clip Site" would be more palatable let's 
say, but far fewer people would recognize what was meant, a speaker 
using that term would just have to clarify his/her meaning "I mean a web 
site that depends on Flash"

Post a reply to this message