Darren New wrote:
> I'd already suggested basing it on an existing scripting language, but I 
> got shot down without understanding what the actual objection was.

That you should not participate in discussions whose topic you don't 
understand.  This isn't Computer Science 101.

> I don't imagine anyone who wrote code 10 years ago cares, but if they 
> *did* want to sue, I'm pretty sure they could at least make a case that 
> POV 4.0 would be a derivative work of theirs if everyone working on 4.0 
> also helped develop 3.x, named it the same name, etc etc etc.

Please, spare us your amateur legal FUD.

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message