> My question: the inverse transform is probably applied to the entire
> transform. Would it be feasible to implement my own macro to inverse a
> matrix, or would that be wasted time?

Note to self: Wasted time. It suffices to multiply the matrix by a larger
value to have the values on a better scale (low-value calculations are
always prone to precision problems...)

-- 
"Tim Nikias v2.0"
Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>

Post a reply to this message