> What you say would certainly make sense, in which case the documentation
on
> that part would be flat wrong/incomplete.

That particular section of the documentation is poorly put together, in my
opinion. The reason for this is that the first part (before the "Note") was
what the section contained in POV-Ray 3.1, and then in POV-Ray 3.5 the rest
was added. This causes people to think that a lot of the details which
actually pertain only to method 1 also pertain to methods 2 and 3. It
probably should have been rewritten when different methods were introduced
to avoid this confusion.

 - Slime
 [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]

Post a reply to this message