Great. Thanks for the PNG information. I didn't know the details about 
that one.  :-)

I don't know what to say about the wood grains though, Stephen, except 
maybe "scale" or layering textures. I'm sure somebody with more 
experience will post something better soon.

destroyedlolo wrote:
> t millican wrote:
> 
>> one small note:
>> The BMP format makes for a better image than the JPG format. JPG is 
>> compressed, so it has an advantage in that it takes less disk space 
>> and is more suited for webpages, etc. 
> 
> 
> W/ a qualite ratio > 80%, you can't notice compression artefact on most 
> pictures.
> 
>> For printing, I'd stick with a non-lossy format like bmp and redefine 
>> the resolution (render it according to the formula given by Neil 
>> though) to print.
> 
> 
> Another alternative is PNG format which is compressed w/ a 
> non-destructive algorithm.
> 
>> Merry Christmas.
> 
> 
> Merry Christmas to all.
> 
> Lolo
>

Post a reply to this message