|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
AndyW wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a 3rd year physics undergraduate. I have been assigned an experiment to
> do called Optical Beams. The notes say to use a ray-tracing program called
> Beam Three from Steller Software. I've had a look at this and it seems
> ancient and has an awful interface. I would like to use POV-Ray instead,
> but I'm not sure if it's as 'scientifically-capable' as Beam Three. I've
> pasted in below what I've been asked to do. I'd be grateful if anyone could
> give a quick response to say whether the general ideas are feasable to do
> within POV-Ray.
looking at beam three, it appears to me that this is a completely
different animal from POV-Ray. I would recommend you use it over a
program like POV-Ray, simply because it was designed to model lenses.
While some of the experiments you listed could be visualised with
POV-Ray, I don't think the effects would be 100% measurable, or
accurate. Also, the means to get the light to show up involves photons
and media, which will cause even the simplest scenes to render in hours,
possibly days.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |