|
|
"Alf Peake" <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote in message
news:417e61d1@news.povray.org...
> "Zeger Knaepen" wrote
> >
> > Interesting pattern, I kinda like it :)
>
> Still can't figure out why Escher played with it though. I can't find
> any reference to it now with Google.
>
> > You do know that an image like this gives far better in PNG than
> > JPEG, right?
>
> Errr... the first conversion to 256 colours screwed the colours up. I
> had picked web-safe by mistake. Just tried optimised octree and got a
> 35K file :/
You don't need to convert it to 256 colours, it might be even better if you
don't, or if you do, don't use dithering.
cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x) // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|