|
|
Gena wrote:
> Florian Brucker wrote:
>
>> If web space is the only problem here, I'd be happy to supply some.
>> Although I think first posting the images to pbi is a good idea
>> nevertheless.
>
>
> That's great! I think we will need just two pages.
> First one with all images connected to each other.
> Image size should not be too big smth. like 320*240.
> Each image will have a link to a large version 800*600.
> Second page could have just image names and author
> names.
>
>> IMHO we have to decide which approach we want: There's the "all images
>> share a table element" way or the "that looks like a long table where
>> everybody put different stuff on" approach. I personally like the
>> second one better, i.e. one with the same background etc. in every
>> image. But I'm open to everything here :)
>
>
> I think we should use some kind of mixture of these
> two approaches :)
>
> Gena.
>
how about table being a segment of a circular table, with a hole in it -
sort of a washer with legs on it :-)
camera in center or maybe offset looking across 2 - 3 segments, rotate
visible segment on each visit to web page or make a movie
once above about 5 / 6 entries should smooth out quite nicely
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|