In article <pan### [at] uwaterlooca> , Andrew Clinton 
<ajc### [at] uwaterlooca>  wrote:

> I don't
> understand the motivation for ignoring such discussions just because there
> are some ideas that are not to the 'Team's liking.

It seems you just do not want to understand because I very explicitly made
clear that what you claim in your statement is not the case:

>>>
Every discussion about design ideas is just ignored,
regardless of what is being discussed.  As such, there is simply no judgment
at all made on any idea discussed in public.
<<<

How to misinterpret that statement to "ignoring [..] ideas that are not to
the 'Team's liking." is beyond me, and probably anybody else reading this as
well.

So please stop making absolutely false assertions.

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message