|
 |
Slime <fak### [at] email address> wrote:
> The previous behavior was correct; the current behavior is broken.
Not true. Neither one is correct.
The only question is which one looks better.
> Well, duh. If an object is 1/10000 of the image's width, then of course it
> should be nearly invisible!
Not true. At least not in photography.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
