Christoph Hormann wrote:
> You have failed to bring up any arguments why applying tone
> mapping before antialiasing is more consistent than doing
> it before file writing.

> i think trying to understand the reasons why this is
> changed and why this change is not bad per se and working
> out a solution that does not revert this change would be a
> much more elegant approach.

Oh, but any solution that produce results that to my untrained eye will look
like the AA from POV-Ray 3.5 will be fine by me. I don't feel strongly about
*how* the problem of the jagged edges are solved, just that they are solved
some way or another.

Could you refresh my memory in what exact order things are handled now?
First antialiasing, then gamma-correction, then color clipping? Where does
the non-linear tone mapping fit in? Is it the same as gamma correction?

Rune
-- 
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
rune|vision:  http://runevision.com
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message