Not sure. Many of the concerns raised had to do with simply losing control
of how the image would be used if submitted to the competition. There was an
entire list of legal concerns with the irtc submission agreement. In play
too is they way big organizations work. Lawyers charged with keeping the
company out of legal trouble are not likely to take any risk on something as
relatively unimportant as the submission of an image to the IRTC
competition. It is important to note too the legal department didn't just
say no. They evaluated the situation, the submission agreement and came
back with a detailed response as to why they would not grant permission. I
could understand many of their concerns.
"gregjohn" <pte### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message > >
>
> A reasonable expectation for pre-GA'ed hardware. Would you have been
> allowed to do so using really old masks-- like something from 0.25 um
> generation? Using "kerf macros" instead of customer "product areas" ?
Post a reply to this message
|
