In article <web.40fefb25a404e2e24e6ed3100@news.povray.org> , "Tim F" 
<fen### [at] stanfordedu> wrote:

>> No, that argument is nonsensical.
>
> Then you haven't read it carefully enough.  Whats to say the libraries
> packaged with 3.6 are bug free and will not lead to non-povray related
> error reports in the future?
>
>> The decision stands, and no matter how
>> much you or anybody else complain about it, it will *****not***** change.
>
> Irrelevant - we're discussing the reasons for the decision - not an
> imperative to change it.
>
>> If you or anybody else does not like that - we absolutely do not care.
>
> Neither do I, since "liking it" was never any part of my post.  Again, I'm
> just trying to understand the decision, not challenge it.

I already told you.  You did apparently not understand also I was very
elaborate.  I suggest you just accept it as given if you do not understand
the original answer to your original question in this regard.

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message