|
 |
Hughes, B. wrote:
> "Slime" <fak### [at] email address> wrote in message
> news:40f5dfc1@news.povray.org...
>
>>8---8<
>>Have you posted screenshots of the display window or the actual output?
>
>
> Rendered image files, which were pasted together into a single picture.
>
> Here's a png of the simpler example, marked in red showing where the
> blockiness appears always toward bottom right directions. AA options were
> +a0.05 +am1 +j1.0 used. Contrast enhanced to make it show up better. And
> yes, Ross is right, AA method 2 seems to be okay.
> The original rendered file attached, also. All these images began as PNG, I
> hadn't tried other formats until just now and see that it doesn't change the
> artifact.
>
> Bob H.
Confirmed. It doesn't appear in 3.5, but does in 3.6, In fact.. when I
changed assumed gamma to 2.2, I could still see vestiges of the artifact.
I have to wonder if it has something to do with the change to do the
clipping after antialiasing ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
