"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmx de> wrote in message
news:cbpdhb$7h7$1@chho.imagico.de...
> Just do a simple bit of arithmetic and you will see this does not make
> much sense. 311373 samples in a 320x240 render - that's about 4 samples
> per pixel and you still have nearly the whole final trace left with
> always_sample on, in the end it is probably about 5-6 samples per pixel.
> Of course it is possible to use such radiosity settings but there is
> not much reason to do such a render.
Thanks Christoph, and noted. I'll kill it next chance.
Brian.
Post a reply to this message
|