|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in message
news:40e03787$1@news.povray.org...
> If the scene renders much faster without radiosity (around two orders of
> magnitude), then you are most likely using radiosity incorrectly.
Otherwise
> (i.e. just one order of magnitude faster without radiosity), this is about
> normal.
Good. Thanks for explaining what should be expected of radiosity. This
case is definitely beyond a couple of orders of magnitude, probably three,
as it has run 120 times longer than a render without radiosity, and has now
progressed to 11%.
I'll let it go until tomorrow night - it is already 1:50am and I've already
stolen too much sleep time from work tomorrow - and then I'll pull the
render and redo those settings.
Brian
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |