|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tim Nikias v2.0 wrote:
|>>Anyways, I've used method 2 for this one...
|>
|>Er. Why not use method 3?
|
|
| Is there much difference when comparing
| method 2 intervals 75 samples 1,1
| to
| method 3 intervals 1 samples 75,75?
|
No, but to get full use of the method 3, you shouldn't set the same
number for min samples and max samples. The whole point of method 3 is
that it starts with min samples and adds more where they are needed.
You might also want to take a look at MegaPov 0.7 and the
sample_spacing keyword. It causes the media to be sampled more in
parts of the render where the ray travels a longer way through the
media. In your scene, that means that more samples will get taken near
the horizon (where I assume the banding will be harder to get rid of).
Jerome
- --
******************************
* Jerome M. Berger *
* mailto:jbe### [at] ifrancecom *
* http://jeberger.free.fr/ *
******************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAvMIjqIYJdJhyixIRAm89AJ9tsMAXfINWDFu82psLu1a6sSP0QwCcCzVr
6rjuEs9Jet0OlvbIypa+FIA=
=/+xg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|