|
|
I agree... specially because their text files are almost empty. It gives me
the impression that they just took some pre-made model and rendered the
image with no effort or creativity whatsoever.
I hope the judges will really take that into account.
F
news:4097223f$1@news.povray.org...
> Looks like we got several "not-made-for-IRTC" entries. You know the ones
> created by some commercial package that look nice, but have absolutely
> nothing to do with the topic and have no text file description whatsoever.
> A few examples are the sports car entries and the light beer. Now, the
> light beer would be a serious competitor IF maybe they took the time to
> explain why its a great invention and how they created the image. The
> sports cars are neat but generic. How is that a great invention, its like
> any other car.. For all we know, the image could have come from anywhere
> and taken months to create. It irritates me that people submit these
> entries. Yes they are good but NO they don't deserve to compete because
> they weren't made for the IRTC. I feel as if they should be disqualified,
> but alas I know that could never be or IRTC would lose integrity and there
> would be huge debates on what should stay and what shouldn't.
>
> Skip Talbot
Post a reply to this message
|
|