> However, if you indeed used 2.95.x (and there wasn't some
> obscure upgrade you didn't notice)

        I'll check it again.  Yet I'm pretty sure it was indeed 2.95.4
(I remember the exact number because I could not believe having < 3.2
on the Debian I tried it).  Also the same compiler flags reported in
the initial message of this thread were not supported either.  Only
I didn't check the binary carefully, such started a benchmark run on
it without waiting for completion...
        In between I've quickly installed gcc-3.3.3, so I will need to
"obscure" this one in order to revert to the old gcc for confirmation  ;-)

        - NC

Post a reply to this message