Darren New wrote:

> GreyBeard wrote:
> 
>> There is a point that it is obvously one or the other, but it's the 
>> shades
>> of gray that are troublesome.
> 
> Apparently, watermellons are considered pornographic in many arabic 
> countries, and I've actually received official threats when I had a web 
> site that had pictures of watermellons on it. There really isn't any 
> good definition of porn, no.

I wouldn't consider them porn, but I think they're kinda seedy.
*padum-ching!*
*tap tap tap* Is this thing on?

-- 
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message