|
 |
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
> > "Any rendering program is acceptable."
> Interesting...I did not realize they allowed non-raytracers.
Where have you been living?-) There have been many scanline-rendered winner
images, plus tons of scanline-rendered entries.
> Examples of the current rules, the ones which we are discussing changes
> to. I would find tinting the sky acceptable. Lens flare...perhaps. It
> obviously can't be prevented if it is done within the scene as textured
> discs or actual camera optics. I'd say 2D lens flares are OK as long as
> it's not hand-positioned.
If the irtc becomes a generic computer graphics competition, it
would certainly degrade its interest to the borders of boredom.
It would only enhance the advantage of those people using expensive
several-thousands-of-dollars costing image manipulation programs
(or those using it pirated) which have tons of filters.
Boring. I want to see renderers in action, not photoshop filters.
--
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
