"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:406c2f13@news.povray.org...
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> > Isn't it just a case of recompiling with one change (the expiration date).
>
>   It's not always that simple. There may be unfinished work on progress
> which still has serious flaws and need fixing before the program can
> work. It may be more laborious to "undo" all the changes already made
> than to just finish them.

Ah - reading between the lines here, I take it that no pure source still exists
for beta 2? That seems, well, odd, but at least explains things.

Post a reply to this message