"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:406b21f7$1@news.povray.org...
>
> > Alternatively perhaps even the same beta 2 could be
> > available with only the expiration date changed.
>
> Well, that would actually require more work than preparing a beta 3!
>

Really? I'm surprised.

Isn't it just a case of recompiling with one change (the expiration date).

A new beta (3) would seem to require that as well, plus any appropriate
bug-fixes (which sounds like more work ;).

Curious and confused....

Post a reply to this message