One other thing you might consider. If you use
cylinders and spheres to approximate the outer
surface, you get discontinuous normals when using
caustics and photons.

For the rectangle moving along a spline I would
relay use bicubic patches for the side surfaces.
If the spline is cubic, it is nearly trivial
and otherwise do a piece wise cubic approximation,
That would be more in style and you get smooth
normals everwhere.

	Andrel

lars petter wrote:

> "Mike Williams" <nos### [at] econymdemoncouk> wrote in message
> news:mlb### [at] econymdemoncouk...
> 
>>Wasn't it lars petter who wrote:
>>
>>>Hello!
>>>
>>>At school, we're developing a modelling tool that will generate shapes
> 
> such
> 
>>>as bezier curves, parabolas, ellipses and such in povray.
>>>
>>>In the tool we have the parametrisised functions for all the shapes, so
> 
> when
> 
>>>it comes to the Pov-Ray script-generation, we're thinking about using the
>>>Parametric Object.
>>>
>>>However, our shapes are supposed to have thickness and a height as well,
> 
> and
> 
>>>the Pov-Ray online documentation says; "The parametric object is not a
> 
> solid
> 
>>>object it is "hollow", like a thin shell."
>>>
>>>So then we're wondering if there is some way to make these objects have a
>>>thickness as well.. Like one does with the isosurfaces, just subtract the
>>>thickness from the equation or something...?
>>>
>>>The perfect solution however, would be that something like this can be
> 
> done:
> 
>>>http://hovedprosjekter.hig.no/v2004/data/gruppe11/param_obj.gif
>>>
>>>A rectangle is swept along a parametrisised 3d spline to construct the
> 
> solid
> 
>>>object.. is this possible?
>>
>>All objects in POV are "hollow" in the sense meant in that part of the
>>documentation. The only difference with parametric objects is that many
>>sets of parametric equations result in surfaces that are open.
>>
>>I guess that you're only thinking of using the "parametric object"
>>because you're working with "parameterisised functions" and they sound a
>>bit like they might be the same sort of thing. The tricky bit is going
>>to be that the "parameterisised functions" that create your curves are
>>likely to be three one-dimensional functions, whereas the POV parametric
>>object requires three two-dimensional functions.
>>
>>Do take a look at the "bent prism" and the "sweepspline" in my
>>isosurface tutorial.
>><http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/isotut/more.htm>
>><http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/isotut/splines.htm>
>>
>>but you might be better off just doing exactly what is drawn in that gif
>>image you mentioned. Draw a large number of rounded rectangles that
>>follow the curve. If you draw them so that they are closer than a pixel
>>then they look like a continuous shape.
>>
>>Here's some code that does that. Note the "Turn" parameter which
>>determines whether the rectangles are placed perpendicular to the path
>>or perpendicular to the z-axis.
>>
>>#version 3.5;
>>global_settings {assumed_gamma 1.0}
>>camera {location  <0,0,-10> look_at <0,0,0> angle 30}
>>background {rgb 1}
>>light_source {<30, 100, -30> color rgb 1}
>>#include "transforms.inc"
>>
>>// The "spline" parameters
>>#declare fx=function(u){sin(u)+cos(2*u)}
>>#declare fy=function(u){sin(3*u)}
>>#declare fz=function(u){u}
>>
>>#declare Height=0.5;            // Rectangle Height
>>#declare Width=0.3;             // Rectangle Width
>>#declare Radius=0.05;           // Rectangle roundness
>>#declare Step = Radius/50;      // Make this smaller for larger images
>>                                // and smaller for quick tests
>>
>>#declare Turn=1;             // set to 0 for the Rectangle to not turn
>>
>>#declare Rect = union {
>>  sphere {<Width,Height,0>,Radius}
>>  sphere {<-Width,Height,0>,Radius}
>>  sphere {<-Width,-Height,0>,Radius}
>>  sphere {<Width,-Height,0>,Radius}
>>  cylinder {<Width,Height,0><-Width,Height,0>,Radius}
>>  cylinder {<-Width,Height,0><-Width,-Height,0>,Radius}
>>  cylinder {<-Width,-Height,0><Width,-Height,0>,Radius}
>>  cylinder {<Width,-Height,0><Width,Height,0>,Radius}
>>  pigment {rgb 1}
>>}
>>
>>#declare E=0.00001;
>>#declare i=-1;
>>#while (i<1)
>>  //Use this to show the track of the "spline"
>>  //sphere {<fx(i),fy(i),fz(i)>,0.01 pigment {rgb x}}
>>
>>  #if (Turn)
>>    // calculate the direction
>>    #declare D=<fx(i),fy(i),fz(i)> - <fx(i-E),fy(i-E),fz(i-E)>;
>>    // sweep out with turning rounded rectangle
>>    object {Rect
>>      transform {Reorient_Trans(z,D)}
>>      translate <fx(i),fy(i),fz(i)>
>>    }
>>  #else
>>    // sweep out with rounded rectangle
>>    object {Rect translate <fx(i),fy(i),fz(i)>}
>>  #end
>>  #declare i=i+Step;
>>#end
>>
>>-- 
>>Mike Williams
>>Gentleman of Leisure
> 
> 
> 
> Okay, i see.. But will the rectangles function as a continous shape as well?
> I'm asking since we are going to place some lights and such to generate
> caustics.. and the objects ought to be solid then.. No light should go
> through them :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Lars Petter
> 
>

Post a reply to this message