"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:8tq950533hi5lhkpn4b4d4gldvsu1itssh@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:04:32 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
> >
> >"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
> >news:ckk450lnbdnblaoraon012lrm4dt0vjefb@4ax.com...
> >
> >   That's nice. Very soothing to the eye. How did you get the name for
> >this image?
>
> It's the title of an old ELO song. It's about a woman called Susan who
> is an heiress of some sort who is basically fed up with her life.
> Apparently the UK's Radio 1 used to play it, not realising that the
> word "f*ck" was in it.


Wow, good thing it wasn't played in America. There's a bill pending right
now to up the severity of using naughty words in the media.

Go here: http://thomas.loc.gov/
Type in: HR3687 in the Bill Number field and press [Search].

Because of the media and lawyers, we're guilty until proven innocent and it
can take years to prove us innocent, all the while our lives are ripped
apart. Bundle that with the Patriot Act and there is a loop-hole that makes
it legal to throw us in jail indefinitely without cause. So, I better
shut-up if I want to keep making POV-Ray scenes from outside a cell and make
amends for my voting record this term.

(Sorry for the off-topic statement. To bring it back on...)

What is that shape on the right? That doesn't look like a primitive. Is that
a patch or an isosurface? I like the ior and color usage. Very artistic!

-- 
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message