|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
IMBJR wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:37:21 -0000, "scott" <spa### [at] spam com> wrote:
>
> > IMBJR wrote:
> > > On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:20:26 -0000, "scott" <spa### [at] spam com> wrote:
> > > > Well I feel sorry for you if you think differently, but the
> > > > English dictionary *defines* English words. How could you
> > > > possibly argue with the dictionary? Do you have your own
> > > > version of English?
> > >
> > > No, don't be silly. A dictionary is NOT to be used for a tool in a
> > > discussion on the meaning of terms because it cannot do the term
> > > justics.
> >
> > Oh just grow up, the dictionary says that one meaning of
> > "community" is a group of people sharing an interest. You are
> > saying it's not (even though I've given you an example (scientific
> > community). Now which one do you think is correct?
>
> No you for sure.
What does this mean?
> Don't use a dictionary - it shows you are not
> thinking about the matter at hand.
LOL I think it just shows you're not thinking :-)
Is English your first language? I've noticed in quite a lot of your posts
sentances either don't make sense or there are a lot of errors. I doubt
anyone would take advice on the meaning of words from someone who can't even
demonstrate a basic understanding of sentance construction!
Oh well, I've wasted enough time already, clearly you think your English is
superior to the dictionary, so there's not much more I can say! Cya!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |