IMBJR <no### [at] spamhere> wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:48:50 +0100, "Thorsten Froehlich"
><tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>
>>In article <404b7a76@news.povray.org> , Lutz-Peter Hooge <lpv### [at] gmxde> 
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Unlikely, I doubt there is any sigificant market for graphics viewer
>>> utilities even on windows. So I don't think support for jpeg2k will
>>> be brought to other systems by commercial software.
>>
>>Actually, on Mac OS QuickTime supports it.  So in just about any decent Mac
>>OS newsreader and web browser one can view the image inline.  Still, there
>>is no value added by it being JPEG 2000 and in 16 bits per color component.
>
> The value is in the better compression.

And the 640x480 filesize limitation imposed by your favorite plugin!

Oh, wait...

-Eamon

Post a reply to this message