|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
IMBJR wrote:
>
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:38:37 -0800, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >IMBJR wrote:
> >
> >> But that does not stop me from replying. Tis the nature of usenet.
> >> Deal with it.
> >
> >This is not usenet. This is a privately owned news server that neither
> >takes a feed from, nor provides a feed to, usenet. That it remains wholly
> >unmoderated is a testament to the general good behavior of its guests.
>
> You really are stuck in a tape loop aren't you?
>
> I think you will find the majority of usenet servers privately owned.
>
> Just because this one is isolated from the rest of usenet does not
> make it any less a form of usenet.
When news servers are networked together they are part of a users
network of news servers (usenet). A stand alone news server, that
is not networked with other news servers, is just a news server.
The differences are subtle but they are there. Last I'll say on
the subject.
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |