I don't know if it would work in tribunals, but technically for images 
of which you didn't release the source code, you have a mean to show 
that you are the owner, by showing an Higher resolution image for 
example which the other guy wouldn't be able to do.

JC


> In article <4048fb4a@news.povray.org>,
>  "Gilles Tran" <gitran_nospam_@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Dear POVers
> 
> 
> [.../...]
> 
> 
>>G.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to cash in on this opportunity to ask what is the legal status 
> of the "Copyright". I often see artists who append a copyright to their 
> images (which of course is justified), but does it has a real 
> signification ? Don't we need to register on an official organism which 
> would vouch for the autenticity of the work ? Is it enough to write 
> "copyright" and your name to make it your intellectual property ?
> 
> I had troubles wandering on the web to find these informations.
> 
> Thanks,



-- 
http://exether.free.fr/irtc (more IRTC stats !)

Post a reply to this message