Well this is a fascinating discussion--I had always thought that Windows 
  XP was only an incremental improvement over Win2K, but that belief 
seems to have been shattered not only by Warp and Darren's observations 
but my own two eyes as well.

When benchmarks consistently run 20-25% faster on the same workstation 
and the **only** change that was made was to upgrade the O/S, the only 
logical conclusion would seem to be that **something** in the O/S was 
improved between Win2K and XP.

Post a reply to this message